Post by Silly Yak on Jan 16, 2011 6:19:38 GMT
American Study 2003
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12591058
RESULTS: The prevalence of celiac disease in relatives of affected sib pairs was as follows: 21.3% (13/61) of siblings (lambda(S) = 53); 14.7% (10/68) of offspring (lambda(O) = 37); 17.2% (28/163) of first-degree relatives; 19.5% (16/82) of second-degree relatives; and 17.8% (52/292) of all relatives (lambda(R) = 44.5).
CONCLUSIONS: In these families, we identified a sibling risk approximately double that found in previous reports, as well as significant risk for more distant relatives, probably because of sharing of a common gene. In families where at least two siblings have been diagnosed with celiac disease, relatives are at high risk for celiac disease. Screening should be considered for all family members.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12591058
RESULTS: The prevalence of celiac disease in relatives of affected sib pairs was as follows: 21.3% (13/61) of siblings (lambda(S) = 53); 14.7% (10/68) of offspring (lambda(O) = 37); 17.2% (28/163) of first-degree relatives; 19.5% (16/82) of second-degree relatives; and 17.8% (52/292) of all relatives (lambda(R) = 44.5).
CONCLUSIONS: In these families, we identified a sibling risk approximately double that found in previous reports, as well as significant risk for more distant relatives, probably because of sharing of a common gene. In families where at least two siblings have been diagnosed with celiac disease, relatives are at high risk for celiac disease. Screening should be considered for all family members.